Please comment on the latest ATF rule regarding the “Definition...

Buy product

Ships From: United States (US)

Sold By : Boss Guns Store




The BATFE (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) recently released information on how they will be determining what constitutes a Frame or a Receiver and more bad identification rules.

If this were to pass, it is possible that the ATF could classify AR15 upper receivers as the “frame” of a gun and require it to be serialized and go through an FFL.

For more information on what this rule will do, watch this video by Gun Lawyer Matt Larosiere

We urge you to review the BATFE’s most recent proposal, get informed, and take immediate action.


First and foremost, visit the link below and comment by August 15th, 2021. This topic is currently open for comment on the Federal Register. It has been opened for comment and has a 90 day window.

***Keep comments professional and double check all information as improper comments will be discarded.***

**Any threats, vulgarity, swearing, nonsense, etc in your comments means your comment will go straight into the trash and the ATF does not even have to look at it.**

[**Please watch this video by gun lawyer Matt Larosiere on how to submit an effective comment.**](

State why the ATF should or should not do whatever, support that with something more than “muh rights/2nd amendment/constitution/god”, and suggest an alternative action.

>*Most gun owners, like myself, are law abiding citizens. We go to work, take care of our families, and do our best to comply with the law. The problem is that the law keeps changing or at least the interpretation of said law. Especially when the political climate changes. I know the BATFE has a job to do. And i know there are bad guys you are trying to catch but most of the time it ends up just hurting the average Joe trying to life his life, take care of his family, chase happiness. I ask y’all to reconsider the reclassifacation of receivers and frames and make the rules for them direct, clear, and understandable for the average person. Please remember we are Americans like you are. Thank you!*

Comments like this are more effective and compelling rather than

>*Shall not be infringed does not mean infringing via “rule” or “definition” changes at a whim depending on the political climate. It means SHALL. NOT. BE. INFRINGED. The proposed rule change is unconstitutional. I do not support this action.*


*Definition of Frame or Receiver and Identification of Firearms*


>*All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number (ATF-2021-0001). All properly completed comments received will be posted without change to the Federal eRulemaking portal,, including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the “Public Participation” heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.*

>>***1. Be legible and appear in minimum 12-point font size (.17 inches);***

>>***2. Be 8 1/2″ x 11″ paper;***

>>***3. Be signed and contain the commenter’s complete first and last name and full mailing address; and***

>>***4. Be no more than four pages long.***

SHARE this information with everyone you know. This determination has an impact well outside Pistol Stabilizing Braces. It affects us all.

Write your local and state representatives and tell them you do not support this type of action.

Support the Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition (FRAC)

**Link to submit public comments.**



There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “Please comment on the latest ATF rule regarding the “Definition...”
No ratings have been submitted for this product yet.